Applicant has burden to prove that it did not abandon a prior non-conforming use

SteveK November 18th, 2009

In Beverly Square Association, Inc. vs. Zoning Board of Adjust of the City of Trenton et al., the New Jersey Appellate Division held that a property owner, applicant for permit to renovate a prior non-conforming use, has the ultimate burden of proof that the prior use had not been abandoned. In the case, the defendant was issued a permit to renovate 20 residential apartments deemed by the Trenton zoning officer to be a preexisting non-conforming use.  Beverly Square Association appealed the decision to the Trenton Zoning Board of Adjustment, arguing that the defendant’s nonconforming use had been abandoned (i) after a tax foreclosure on the property, and (ii) as a result of the 18-month vacancy and state of disrepair. The Board affirmed the decision of the zoning officer, which was appealed to the Superior Court. The Court reversed finding that the property owner failed to prove that the use had not been abandoned.

 The Appellate Court determined that the objector must initially come forward with sufficient evidence of temporal or physical abandonment; however the property owner had the ultimate burden of proof as to the intent to resume the prior non-conforming use of the property within the 18-month period provided in the municipal ordinance. The Court remanded the case to trial court for the matter to be considered in with the clarification on the burden of proof.

DiFrancesco, Bateman, Coley, Yospin, Kunzman, Davis & Lehrer, PC ( http://www.dbnjlawblog.com) is a full service law firm in New Jersey which provides a broad range of legal services, including the representation of parties in zoning, land use and local government matters. For additional information about the matters in this bulletin or in the firm’s land use, zoning and municipal please contact Jeffrey B. Lehrer, Esq.

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.